Patents

Decision Information

Decision Content

REGISTERED

 

April 26, 1985

 

Ridout & Maybee

2300 Richmond-Adelaide Centre

101 Richmond St. W.

Toronto, Ont. M5H 2J7

 

Application No:   396,905

Date Filed:       Feb. 23, 1982

Title: Drug Administration Device

 

Dear Sir,

 

Applicant requested by letter dated March 22, 1985 that this applic-

ation be considered by the Patent Appeal Board for the purpose of

setting a time for the commencement of an action under Section 63(2).

 

The Patent Appeal Board has considered the request and has advised

me as follows:

 

The Canadian patent cited by the examiner, 1,173,795

issued on September 4, 1984, i.e. after the filing of

applicant's application.

 

Included in Section 63(2) is the following provision:

 

...an application for a patent for an invention

for which a patent has already issued under this

Act shall be rejected...

 

Section 63(2) has been dealt with in the decision in re

Fry 1 C.P.R. p.135 where it was found the provisions of

S63(2) "...extend only to the case of an application filed

after the issue of another patent disclosing or claiming

the same invention..."

 

In view of applicant's filing date which is before the

issue of Canadian patent 1,173,795, S63(2) dies not set

out any provisions under which the Commissioner may take

any action on this application, including setting a time

for applicant to commence an action in the Federal Court.

 

Consequently the Board recommends that the Commissioner

does not set a time for the applicant to commence an

action to set aside the patent. The application should

be returned to the examiner for normal prosecution.

 

I agree with the recommendations of the Board, accordingly I do not

reject this application under Section 63(2) and I do not set a time

within which Applicant should commence an action in the Federal Court.

The application will be returned to the examiner for normal prosecu-

tion.

 

Yours truly

 

J.H.A Gari‚py

Commissioner of Patents

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.