Patents

Decision Information

Decision Content

                COMMISSIONER'S DECISION

 

Indefiniteness - Casting Apparatus

 

The claims are directed to a heating chamber with a particular crucible

arrangement. A number of claims were rejected for being indefinite.

Final Action: Affirmed

 

                       ******

 

Patent application 280,214 (Class 307-29), was filed on June 9, 1977

for an invention entitled "Melting And Casting Apparatus." The inventors

are Matti J. Saarivirta et al. The Examiner in charge of the application

took a Final Action on July 15, 1981 refusing to allow it to proceed to

patent.

 

The application relates to improvements in an electric furnace for melting

and casting metals and metal alloys. The improvements are directed to

the heating chamber with a particular crucible arrangement and the electric

heating means.

 

The Final Action was based on the indefiniteness of the claims and the

proper support for the supplementary claims. No prior art was cited in

the Final Action.

 

In response to the Final Action the Applicant concelled all of the claims

and submitted new claims 1 to 8.

 

Claims 1 to 4 and 7 were accepted by the Examiner, while claims 5 and 6,

in the opinion of the Examiner, should not appear as claims supported by

the supplementary disclosure, because the subject matter covered was

cancelled from the original disclosure. Further, claim 8 was held to,

be redundant over claim 3.

 

We have carefully considered these points and we concur with the views

of the Examiner.

 

With this in mind, we contacted the Agent, Mr. J. Lamb, and discussed

our views with him. After due consideration Mr. Lamb filed an appropriate

amendment cancelling claims 5, 6 and 8 and made other minor amendments to

the claims.

 

No further discussion is deemed necessary and we recommend that the present

claims be accepted.

 

J.F. Hughes

Assistant Chairman

Patent Appeal Board, Canada

 

I concur with the reasoning and findings of the Patent Appeal Board.

Accordingly, I direct that prosecution should resume on the basis of the

present claims.

 

J.H.A. Gari‚py

Commissioner of Patents

 

Dated at Hull, Quebec

this 1st. day of June, 1982

 

Agent for Applicant

 

Scott & Aylen

170 Laurier Ave. V.

Ottawa, Ont.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.