36 result(s)
-
1.
Raytheon Company (Re) - 2021 CACP 53 - 2021-12-16
PatentsDivision - Division
Novelty - Novelty
Obviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Member Mehdi Ghayour Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
2.
CD 1515 - 2550067 - 2020-01-14
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Leigh Matheson Mara Gravelle Liang Ji Member Member Member Decision of The Commissioner
-
3.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (Re) - 2021 CACP 14 - 2021-03-25
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [39] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be allowed because the claims on file define patentable subject-matter and thus comply with section 2 of the Patent Act.
-
4.
Paymentus Corporation (Re) - 2021 CACP 23 - 2021-05-06
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [40] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be refused because claims 1 to 5 on file are directed to non-patentable subject-matter, which is prohibited under subsection 27(8) of the Patent Act and falls outside the definition of
-
5.
Deck Chair Learning Systems, Inc. (Re) - 2021 CACP 22 - 2021-05-04
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [36] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be allowed because claims 1 to 38 on file define patentable subject-matter and thus comply with subsection 27(8) and section 2 of the Patent Act.
-
6.
The Proctor & Gamble Company (Re) - 2022 CACP 23 - 2022-11-23
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Member DECISION OF THE Assistant COMMISSIONER [53] I concur with the conclusion and recommendation of the Board.
-
7.
Financial Consulting & Trading International, Inc (Re) - 2021 CACP 7 - 2021-03-17
PatentsNovelty - Novelty
Novelty - Novelty - Anticipation
Obviousness
Liang Ji Blair Kendall Member Member Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
8.
CD 1518 - 2495718 - 2020-02-10
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Andrew Strong Ed MacLaurin Member Member Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
9.
Johnson Outdoors, Inc (Re) - 2022 CACP 24 - 2022-11-30
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Vincent Pellerin Member Member Member Decision of the Commissioner
-
10.
Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (Re) - 2021 CACP 32 - 2021-06-09
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [43] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be refused because claims 1 to 5 on file are directed to non-patentable subject-matter, which is prohibited under subsection 27(8) of the Patent Act and falls outside the definition of
-
11.
CD 1496 - 2577118 - 2019-09-19
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Disclosure - Adequacy or Deficiency of Description
Obviousness - Obviousness
Leigh Matheson Marcel Brisebois Liang Ji Member Member Member Decision of The Commissioner
-
12.
CD 1396 - 2385395 - 2016-04-28
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Utility - Utility
Paul Fitzner Mark Couture Liang Ji Member Member Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
13.
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. (Re) - 2022 CACP 4 - 2022-01-27
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Disclosure - Adequacy or Deficiency of Description
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Liang Ji Christine Teixeira Christian Workman Member Member Member
-
14.
Teletracking Technologies, INC. (Re) - 2021 CACP 45 - 2021-10-28
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Blair Kendall Cara Weir Member Member Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
15.
CFPH, LLC (Re) - 2021 CACP 17 - 2021-04-21
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Computer Programs
Subject Matter (part 1) - Games
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Liang Ji Member Lewis Robart Member DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
-
16.
Baxter International Inc. (Re) - 2020 CACP 26 - 2020-06-15
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Stephen MacNeil Howard Sandler Member Member Member
-
17.
CD 1520 - 2307484 - 2020-02-12
PatentsClaims - Excessive Width - Not Supported by Disclosure
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Liang Ji Stephen MacNeil Leigh Matheson Member Member Member Decision of the Commissioner
-
18.
Smart Technologies ULC (Re) - 2021 CACP 40 - 2021-09-08
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Computer Programs
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [59] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be refused because claims 1 to 34 on file are directed to non-patentable subject-matter, which is prohibited under subsection 27(8) of the Patent Act and falls outside the definition
-
19.
CD 1487 - 2809500 - 2019-07-04
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Leigh Matheson Paul Fitzner Liang Ji Member Member Member Decision of The Commissioner
-
20.
SHIGABUTDINOV, RUSLAN ALBERTOVICH (Re) - 2023 CACP 16 - 2023-06-02
PatentsObviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Howard Sandler Blair Kendall Member Member Member
-
21.
Google LLC (Re) - 2021 CACP 47 - 2021-11-05
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Obviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Paul Fitzner Kristina Bodnar Member Member Member
-
22.
Lynn Tilton (Re) - 2020 CACP 2 - 2020-04-07
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Paul Fitzner Lewis Robart Member Member Member Decision of the Commissioner
-
23.
Safeway, Inc (Re) - 2024 CACP 7 - 2024-04-26
PatentsClaims - Ambiguity or Indefiniteness (incomplete)
Obviousness - Obviousness
Subject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Liang Ji Michael Ott Christine Teixeira Member Member Member
-
24.
Amazon Technologies Inc. (Re) - 2021 CACP 11 - 2021-03-25
PatentsDisclosure - Adequacy or Deficiency of Description
Obviousness - Obviousness
Liang Ji Leigh Matheson Robilyn Vanos Member Member Member
-
25.
Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Re) - 2020 CACP 28 - 2020-07-13
PatentsSubject Matter (part 1) - Meaning of Art
Subject Matter (part 1) - Mere Plan
Liang Ji Member Decision of the Commissioner [47] I concur with the findings of the Board and its recommendation that the application should be refused because the claims on file do not define statutory subject-matter and thus do not comply with section 2 of the Patent Act.